The aviation sector, which accounts for 2% of global greenhouse gas emissions, is taking action today to make aviation more sustainable. This is known as decarbonisation of the aviation sector, which currently relies on fossil fuels. This is also the goal that Europe and the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) have set themselves: achieving carbon neutrality in the aviation sector by 2050. Innovation and technological progress (R&D) are the main drivers of development for decarbonised aviation. Nevertheless, there are other equally effective measures that airlines and airports have begun implementing. The Airports & Travel Eco-Criterion was developed with this in mind. Its aim is to help you make an informed travel choice, thanks to a tool that assesses the concrete ecological actions implemented by stakeholders in the aviation sector. 

Airports & Travel’s Airport Eco-criterion: committed and transparent

Recognising and encouraging initiatives by airlines and airports

An objective Eco-criterion based on European ambitions and directives

Enabling travellers to make an informed choice 

Airport Eco-criterion

Structure of the Airport Eco-criterion
Value
Airport Carbon Accreditation (ACA) label
Aéro Biodiversité label
Actions to preserve biodiversity
Alternative energy supply
Policy for the responsible management of natural resources
Waste sorting and recycling policy
Installation of Solar panels
Development of airport access facilities
Other environmental initiatives

Airports: stakeholders in a more sustainable aviation sector

Airports are assessed on the basis of their energy efficiency, their ecological management and their commitment to reducing CO2 emissions.

Energy efficiency and environmental management at airports

The “Airport Carbon Accreditation (ACA)” label

In 2009, the “Airport Carbon Accreditation” (ACA) label was launched at the European level and gradually expanded worldwide until 2014. It is the only global carbon management certification programme for airports recognised by institutional bodies. It offers 7 accreditation levels (1, 2, 3, 3+, 4, 4+, 5) to encourage, support and guide the decarbonisation of airport activities. The ACA label becomes significant from level 3, “Optimization,” onward, by involving the airport and its stakeholders in reducing its carbon footprint. This may involve optimising in-flight operations, such as improving approach and take-off procedures, or Eco-taxiing to optimise ground operations, with a single engine running for movements on the apron, electric taxiing, or any other equipment powered by electricity or hydrogen … ACA level 3 includes Scope 3 carbon emissions and accurately measures the carbon footprint in order to reduce it effectively. The higher accreditation levels demonstrate that an airport is making genuine efforts and is committed to reducing its carbon footprint, thereby contributing to the overall achievement of carbon-neutral aviation by 2050. ACA level 4 incorporates the long-term dimension of emissions reduction targets, in line with reduction pathways derived from the Paris Agreement. The two levels (3+ and 4+) include compensation for residual emissions in addition to reducing emissions at source. Finally, level 5 represents the most advanced approach by incorporating the concept of carbon neutrality. The airport must be able to achieve net-zero emissions for its Scope 1 emissions—in other words, direct emissions related to airport operations—and its Scope 2 emissions, namely indirect emissions associated with the energy consumption required for airport operations. Indirect Scope 3 emissions, such as emissions from modes of transport used to reach the airport, must also progressively achieve carbon neutrality in collaboration with stakeholders (for example, a bus company providing a connection to the airport). Residual emissions that are unavoidable by nature, such as those associated with digital services or travel, must in turn be offset and optimized.

Airline Eco-criterion

Airline Eco-criterion structure
Value
Average age of the fleet
11 years
Fuel-efficient aircraft in the fleet
Investing in more sustainable aviation
Carbon offsetting programme
Optimised flight operations
Setting up Eco-programmes

Various low-carbon strategies implemented by airlines

The airlines can take action to reduce their CO2 emissions. With this in mind, Airports & Travel has mapped out the measures specific to airlines, such as purchasing new aircraft to lower the average age of their fleet, as well as renewing it by acquiring low-emission aircraft. Airlines can also implement Research & Development programmes (or Investing in more sustainable aviation) and carbon offsetting schemes for CO2 emissions. The development of electric- or hydrogen-powered aircraft appears promising in helping decarbonise the aviation sector. Research into Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) can effectively reduce atmospheric emissions generated by the combustion of kerosene. Air operations management, such as eco-taxiing, is another lever for optimising fuel consumption. Finally, airlines can implement eco-programmes. These initiatives, such as recycling waste on board, represent an interesting approach to protecting the environment, alongside efforts to directly reduce the aviation sector’s carbon footprint.

Technological progress to reduce carbon emissions at source

The Airline Eco-Criterion focuses on greenhouse gas emissions at source and highlights the levers that effectively help reduce co2 emissions and their impact. The weighting of the Airline Eco-Criterion primarily rewards the average fleet age, the presence of cleaner aircraft within the fleet, and R&D (or Investing in more sustainable aviation). Carbon offsetting and air operations management remain complementary levers for action. Finally, eco-programmes are not sufficient to make an airline an active contributor to the decarbonisation of the aviation sector. This is a good start, but it remains insufficient. The Airline Eco-Criterion therefore assigns them less weight.

The average age of the fleet 

Airlines are investing heavily in fleet renewal, with fleet composition varying according to the airline and the types of flights operated. It is not uncommon to see older and newer aircraft within the same fleet. Airports & Travel takes the average age of the fleet into account, indicating that the higher it is, the greater the potential impact on overall kerosene consumption. 

The presence of high-performance aircraft within the airline’s fleet 

This component assesses whether or not a given airline’s fleet includes low-CO2-emission aircraft, such as the Airbus A330 neo-series or certain Boeing aircraft and the 777X. It focuses on aircraft currently in service.  

Investment in the use of Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF)

The use and development of alternative fuels—Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) (biofuels and synthetic fuels)—is at the heart of an effective approach to decarbonising the aviation sector. Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) are currently a promising solution, but due to an industry that is still underdeveloped and not very competitive, they are not yet operational.

Investment in fleet renewal

Fleet renewal involves acquiring aircraft that are more energy-efficient than their predecessors. These next-generation aircraft have been designed to optimise fuel consumption, with features such as drag-reducing wings, new engines and improved payload capacity (optimised aircraft load capacity to avoid excessive fuel consumption). This dimension takes into account the effective planning of this type of investment.

R&D for a new generation of eco-efficient aircraft

Investment in research into new generations of aircraft relates to new fuselages, new engines and, of course, hydrogen- or electric-powered aircraft. This includes the necessary adaptation of infrastructure dedicated to this new type of aviation, such as electric charging and hydrogen supply systems.

Carbon offsetting programmes

There are currently 2 types of carbon offsetting: regulatory carbon offsetting and voluntary carbon offsetting. Both aim to offset residual CO2 emissions, that is, emissions that could not be reduced or eliminated at source. 

Regulatory carbon offsetting includes the European Union Emissions Trading System EU-ETS (Emission Trading Scheme or carbon market) and CORSIA (Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation). 

These two systems follow the same principle : each year, the market sets a certain level of emissions credits (or emission allowances), which is then distributed among all system members. This level corresponds to the volume of greenhouse gas emissions that a company wishes to offset. At the end of the year, if its CO2 emissions exceed the annual allowances it has acquired, the company is penalised and must purchase additional allowances to restore balance. This is the polluter-pays principle. Conversely, a company that has emitted less than the amount covered by the emissions credits it purchased may carry those credits over to the following year. In all cases, the amount paid for this purpose contributes, directly or indirectly, to funding a carbon reduction or sequestration project. 

Voluntary carbon offsetting does not, or only minimally, meet regulatory requirements (for labelling, monitoring, verification, etc.). Any entity can demonstrate its environmental commitment by funding carbon reduction or sequestration projects, such as forestry projects, renewable energy projects or projects focused on the efficient use of energy. 

Optimisation of flight operations

This concerns the management by airlines of air traffic and operations both in flight and on the ground. This component covers all the operations an airline can implement to optimise its fuel consumption: improving flight plans, optimising the load/cargo carried in flight, and maintaining the aircraft and ensuring its proper condition. These actions are all the more effective when combined with those implemented by airports, particularly Eco-taxiing, APU optimisation (Auxiliary Power Unit or Auxiliary Power Group—GAP), etc.

Other environmental initiatives

Airlines can adopt other strategies to reduce their environmental impact. Eco-programmes focus more on overall environmental impact than on carbon footprint. These may include implementing a zero-single-use-plastic policy on board their flights or recycling tableware. 


For further information:

Ministry for Ecological Transition and Territorial Cohesion - Aviation and Environment

Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation - CORSIA

Roadmap for Decarbonizing the Aviation Sector

Voluntary Carbon Offsetting: Approaches and Limitations - ADEME

Eco-criterion Route

Structure Eco-criterion Route
Value
Average flight time by route
greater than or equal to 5 hours
Airport Carbon Accreditation (ACA) Departure Airport
level 3
Airport Carbon Accreditation (ACA) – Airport: Arrival
level 3
Carbon-offset route

The carbon impact is proportional to the air routes

An air route is an itinerary connecting a departure airport and an arrival airport, operated by one or more airlines. Clearly, the longer an aeroplane flies, the more emissions are produced. The Eco-criterion Air Route assesses the energy impact of a route by evaluating average flight duration, environmental measures taken at departure and arrival airports, and parameters specific to airline performance. The "airport" and "airline" dimensions of the Eco-criterion are therefore included again in the calculation, along with consideration of air route compensation in France.

Distance, airlines, airports and compensation: the factors affecting air routes

Airports & Travel reaffirms its commitment to developing an objective and transparent Eco-Criterion, in accordance with European and international guidelines. Thus, for the Air Route Eco-Criterion, the route’s average flight time carries the greatest weight, as it directly determines the level of CO2 emissions. Airport Carbon Accreditation (ACA), as a recognised and reliable environmental governance programme, ranks second. Internationally, offsetting for air routes is currently not very well developed. Since, to date, it applies only to routes within France, the weighting of this indicator is currently limited. Indeed, Airports & Travel seeks to highlight concrete environmental initiatives rather than penalise inaction.

The average flight time for the route 

A route is the flight path between two destinations. Its duration, which is related to the distance, determines the carbon footprint: naturally, the greater the distance, the higher the carbon footprint. 

The “Airport Carbon Accreditation” label  

This is the only global carbon management certification programme for airports recognised by institutions. It offers 7 accreditation levels (1, 2, 3, 3+, 4, 4+, 5) to encourage, support and assist with the decarbonisation of airport activities. The ACA label becomes significant from level 3, “Optimization” (Read more in the Airport Eco-criterion section).

Offsetting the air route in France 

Regulatory carbon offsetting can take place on the European emissions credit market (EU-ETS) or via CORSIA. In France, since 15 March 2023, Article 147 of the Climate and Resilience Act requires domestic flights to be fully offset on the EU-ETS market. Commercial aircraft operators are subject to this European offsetting system, as are operators carrying out domestic flights between two airports in France whose emissions exceed 1,000 tonnes of CO2 per year. Accordingly, this eco-criterion applies only to air routes operated in France. 

Eco-criterion Flight

Flight Eco-criterion structure
Value
Direct flight
Flight duration
greater than or equal to 5 hours
Fuel-efficient aircraft
Use of SAF for the flight
Average flight time by route
greater than or equal to 5 hours
Airport Carbon Accreditation (ACA) Departure Airport
level 3
Airport Carbon Accreditation (ACA) – Airport: Arrival
level 3
Carbon-offset route
Average age of the fleet
11 years
Fuel-efficient aircraft in the fleet
Investing in more sustainable aviation
Carbon offsetting programme
Optimised flight operations
Setting up Eco-programmes

The energy efficiency of a flight plays a key role

The Flight Eco-criterion assesses the energy efficiency of a given flight. It takes into account whether the flight is a direct flight or an indirect flight, the flight duration, the type of aircraft used for the flight (new-generation aircraft consume less), and finally whether or not SAF is used. Once again, the focus is on greenhouse gas emissions at source, as well as on the practical measures that can effectively reduce them. The Flight Eco-criterion, the most comprehensive criterion, takes all the Eco-criterion variables into account, including those relating to the air route.

Low-emission aircraft: the only viable solution to date

The Flight Eco-Criterion gives the greatest weight to whether a flight is direct or indirect, its duration, and the type of aircraft used for each flight, as these are the indicators most likely to influence a flight's carbon impact on the same route. Indeed, a connecting flight emits far more CO2 than a direct flight. Similarly, an energy-efficient aircraft consumes less energy than an older-generation aircraft. Given the limited development of alternative fuels and insufficiently incentivizing legislation currently in force, the use of SAF is currently the least important indicator in the Flight Eco-Criterion. Airports & Travel is committed to developing resilient, evolving Eco-Criteria. The weighting assigned to SAF in a flight will likely increase in the future, once SAF is used more significantly. 

Direct or indirect flight 

Takeoff and reaching cruising altitude are the phases of a flight during which kerosene consumption is highest. A direct flight therefore consumes less than a flight with stopovers, where these operations must be repeated. This factor is therefore relevant to users who are able to make a more informed choice and travel more sustainably, as so-called "point-to-point" flights are more environmentally friendly when load factors are equal. Flight prices are also an important criterion for travellers. Knowing that a connecting flight may be cheaper than a direct flight, it is clear that responsibility is shared between the airline offering these flights and the traveller choosing them. Depending on the routes, this is therefore a practical way to effectively reduce energy consumption and limit greenhouse gas emissions. 

Flight duration 

It goes without saying that the longer a flight, the greater the CO2 emissions released into the atmosphere. Thus, any short journey could be considered more environmentally friendly because it is less polluting. Nevertheless, this reasoning has its limits, as the need to travel by air may be dictated by the destination itself. The “flight duration” factor remains meaningful but is limited to an indicative purpose within the Flight Eco-Criterion. In other words, the aim is not to penalise airlines operating long-haul flights and reward those operating short flights; the objective remains the same: to limit greenhouse gas emissions as much as possible. However, Airports & Travel enhances its measurement of a flight’s energy performance with the “Direct or indirect flight” indicator, which provides greater relevance when measuring a flight’s carbon footprint. 

Type of aircraft used for the flight 

Airbus and Boeing have developed families of aircraft that are more energy-efficient. Examples include Airbus’s A330 neo series, as well as the Boeing 747-8 and 777X.
These aircraft are at the cutting edge of technology in terms of fuel consumption, available payload capacity, and engine performance and aircraft design (e.g., “Sharklets ” or “Winglet”). For example, the A320neo offers a 15% improvement in fuel efficiency compared with the standard A320. The latest-generation aircraft from Airbus and Boeing are also more environmentally friendly thanks to their construction. For certain models, such as the A350-1000, the materials used are stronger and more rigid (made from titanium, aluminium alloys and carbon-fibre composites), reducing the aircraft’s weight. Finally, an aircraft’s performance also depends on its engines. In this respect, Rolls-Royce Trent XWB engines reduce CO2 emissions by 25% and noise pollution by 40% compared with older aircraft.
Thus, using a latest-generation aircraft to operate a given flight is an environmentally responsible choice, particularly for long-haul flights or routes requiring a stopover. 

Use of SAF for the flight 

Alternative fuels (biofuels and synthetic fuels) are still underdeveloped because the supply chain remains virtually nonexistent, resulting in costs that are too high and uneconomical for airlines and airports. Although European legislation has evolved on this issue, aiming to incorporate SAF into flights at a rate of 70% by 2050 , their use today remains minimal. Indeed, the price of these biofuels can be up to four times the operating costs associated with kerosene. 
Nevertheless, their effectiveness has been proven. Biofuels produced from cooking oils, certain algae or animal fats can be used by aircraft at a rate of up to 50%, without any modifications being required, and can generate up to 80% reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
Synthetic fuels (hydrogen produced through electrolysis) open up the prospect of a fuel that is entirely neutral in terms of carbon emissions, provided that producing this energy does not emit CO2. 
Like any sector destined to grow, biofuels raise sustainability concerns. It is important to ensure that growing the feedstock does not encroach on food crops and that large-scale production does not disrupt ecosystems (particularly in the case of algae). 

ECO-NEWS

International flights: the EU is preparing a new carbon charge starting in 2029

International flights: the EU is preparing a new carbon charge from 2029

The European Union wants to accelerate the reduction of emissions from air transport. From 2029, international flights of less than 5,000 kilometres departing from or arriving in Europe could be brought into the European carbon trading system. This change is expected to affect certain air connections between Europe and neighbouring countries in particular.

Until now, the European Union Emissions Trading System, known as the ETS, has applied mainly to flights within Europe. With this extension, an air connection such as Paris–Istanbul would be subject to an additional carbon cost. By contrast, longer flights to destinations such as New York, Tokyo or China would initially remain exempt. Private jet flights would also be covered.

This measure is intended to encourage airlines to reduce their emissions. However, it is causing concern in parts of the European aviation sector. Airlines fear losing competitiveness to foreign carriers that would not be subject to the same rules. They are therefore calling for an international approach, particularly through the CORSIA system led by the International Civil Aviation Organization.

Europe also plans to support airlines in their transition. It intends to allocate €15 billion between 2029 and 2040 to the development of Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF). This funding is meant to encourage larger-scale production of lower-carbon fuels and reduce their cost over time.

The proposal could still evolve. If international efforts remain insufficient, the European Union is considering expanding carbon pricing further from 2032. All international flights departing from Europe could then be affected, regardless of their distance.

For travellers, this change could therefore have an indirect impact on ticket prices. For the aviation sector, it chiefly reflects an intention to make emitters pay more for carbon emissions and to accelerate the development of alternatives to conventional jet fuel.

Show less
Rome Ciampino Airport has been awarded 4 Skytrax stars

Rome Ciampino Airport has been awarded 4 Skytrax stars

Ciampino’s “Giovan Battista Pastine” Airport reaches a new milestone by joining the exclusive group of European regional airports awarded a 4-star Skytrax rating. This distinction recognises the quality of the services, the cleanliness of the facilities and the professionalism of the staff. Ciampino thus confirms its key role in the Roman airport system.
Read more
Aviation: night flights as a way to reduce the climate impact

Aviation: night flights as a way to reduce the climate impact

Limiting certain contrails could quickly reduce European aviation’s climate footprint. A recent study shows that targeting night flights, particularly in winter, could deliver significant results without disrupting air traffic. A fast, low-cost technical solution is beginning to emerge.
Read more
SAF: TotalEnergies questions the European strategy

SAF: TotalEnergies questions the European strategy

TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanné is questioning the stability of the European regulatory framework for sustainable aviation fuels (SAF). He criticises a highly regulated yet economically fragile market. The reasons are the high cost of SAF and airlines’ lack of commitment.
Read more
Athens Airport: energy independent – Eco criterion

Athens: Eleftherios Venizelos Airport becomes energy self-sufficient and achieves net-zero

Athens International Airport now generates 100% of its energy from renewable sources and has zero direct emissions, establishing itself as a model of sustainability in European aviation.

Read more
Transition to sustainable fuel: airlines call for a grace period

Transition to sustainable fuel: airlines call for a grace period

In light of the European Union’s rules on the use of sustainable aviation fuel, airlines are warning of the strict deadlines imposed.

Read more
Alternative energy 2

Oneworld joins CO2 Connect

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) and the Oneworld alliance have recently announced a collaboration aimed at strengthening efforts in carbon emissions accounting. This involves 13 airlines, members of Oneworld, committing to share operational data with IATA's CO2 Connect Emissions Calculator.

Read more
environmental protection

Ten pioneering airports have achieved Level 5 certification under the Airport Carbon Accreditation (ACA) scheme

At the 28th United Nations Conference on Climate Change, ACI announced the launch of Level 5 of its global Airport Carbon Accreditation (ACA) programme. It marks a significant step forward in its commitment to carbon neutrality by 2050.

Read more
Eco-friendly actions

MEPs have agreed on a quota for sustainable fuel

Recently, MEPs have introduced a specific fuel quota for aviation. This initiative marks a significant step forward in terms of sustainable fuels and represents an important milestone in the decarbonisation of the air transport industry.

Read more
Changes to flight paths to reduce carbon footprint

Contrails: a new way to reduce aviation’s climate impact

Reducing the impact of contrails by 50% could delay aviation-related warming by 10 years. This is all the more promising given that just 3% of flights would be responsible for 80% of the warming linked to these contrails.

Read more

They support more sustainable aviation

Transavia equips its entire Airbus fleet with IRIS to optimise its flights

Direct Transavia Flights

Transavia is rolling out IRIS across all its Airbus aircraft by the end of October. This satellite technology helps crews communicate more quickly with air traffic control. It can also enable more direct flight paths and reduce fuel consumption.

Air France reduces the climate impact of 130 transatlantic flights

Lufthansa prepares to replace its Airbus A320s with 20 Boeing 737 MAX 10s

Bordeaux Airport speeds up its climate transition

Air Canada and Airbus accelerate their efforts on sustainable fuels

Air Europa significantly reduces its emissions over ten years

Japan Airlines is testing a biofuel made from rice waste

Wizz Air receives its 200th A320neo aircraft

The airports on the French Riviera retain their EcoVadis gold medal

Lorraine Airport is installing nearly 12,000 solar panels